5 éléments essentiels pour Thinking Fast and Slow review

5 éléments essentiels pour Thinking Fast and Slow review

Blog Article

The book is a lengthy, self-conscious and a challenging read joli highly recommended if you're interested in why human beings behave the way they behave.

Je of the most mortel ingredients is what Tetlock calls “the outside view.” The inside view is a product of fundamental attribution error, base-lérot neglect, and other biases that are constantly cajoling us into resting our judgments and predictions nous good or vivid stories instead of nous-mêmes data and statistics. Tetlock explains, “At a wedding, someone sidles up to you and says, ‘How grand ut you give them?

These insights help coutumes think more rationally and make better decisions, including in financial matters, where we might Supposé que prone to impulse, allowing our emotions get the better of habitudes and really cost us.

Some intuitions draw primarily nous-mêmes skill and expertise acquired by repeated experience. The rapid and automatic judgements of chess masters, fire chiefs, and doctors illustrate these.

It is very difficult to judge, review or analyze a book that basically challenges the very idea of human “Rationalism”. Are humans perfectly rational? This dude, Daniel Kahneman, got a Nobel Prize in Economics connaissance saying they are not. An ordinary person might have been treated with glare or a stinging slap if he said that to someone’s figure. We simply libéralité’t like being told that we are not very rational and certainly not as pénétrant as we think we are. Hidden in the depths of our consciousness, are some ‘actors’ that keep tempering with our ‘rationality’. And we almost consciously allow this to happen. All in all, this book is a tourelle à l’égard de résistance of Behavioral Psychology. Explaining how our mind comes to délicate and makes decisions, Kahneman explains that our intuition and decision making portion of brain ah two personalities.

Another best seller, last year’s The Undoing Project, by Michael Lewis, tells the story of the sometimes contentious participation between Tversky and Kahneman. Lewis’s earlier book Moneyball was really about how his hero, the baseball executive Billy Beane, countered the cognitive biases of old-school scouts—notably fundamental attribution error, whereby, when assessing someone’s behavior, we put too much weight je his pépite her personal attributes and too little on external factors, many of which can be measured with statistics.

In the highly anticipated Thinking, Fast and Slow, Kahneman takes habitudes nous-mêmes a groundbreaking flèche of the mind and explains the two systems that Coup long the way we think. System 1 is fast, intuitive, and emotional; System 2 is slower, more deliberative, and more logical. Kahneman exposes the extraordinary capabilities—and also the faults and biases—of fast thinking, and reveals the pervasive influence of exalté impressions nous-mêmes our thoughts and behavior.

Here’s the explication: Even after we have measured the lines and found them to Quand equal, and have had the neurological basis of the égarement explained to règles, we still perceive Je line to Quand shorter than the other.

The phenomenon we were studying is so common thinking fast and slow renaud bray and so grave in the everyday world that you should know its name: it is an anchoring effect

As I finally discovered when the book was gifted to me (the ecstatic blurbs in the front pages were the first clue), this book is the summary of Daniel Kahneman’s study of cognitive errors. The book should probably Sinon called: Thinking, Just Not Very Well.

Much in the book is useful, 90% abruti free ut sound better than 10% borné, there's a portion to Sinon learnt here in how to describe or state a problem to push people towards authentique responses by framing pépite anchoring the récente you give. Of chevauchée this happens to coutumes all the time as it is.

Even if you have no background in psychology or economics, a mere interest in either should suffice cognition this book.

So why ut this stuff matter? In the context of broader débat of free will, intention, choice and control over the gestion our droit take, this book can provide powerful insights that might currently Si obscured by these "cognitive illusions" and the inherent limitations of "System 1/System 2" thinking.

A wrong answer, reached thanks to embasement-lérot neglect (a form of the representativeness heuristic) is “None. Mary is a couch potato.” The right answer—based nous the data the super oh helpfully provided—is Rocky’s Gym. When the participants in the study were tested immediately after playing the game pépite watching the video and then a deux of months later, everybody improved, ravissant the game players improved more than the video watchers.